The fruit of human civilization is humaniterian culture and celebration of life
it's not slavery, not robotism, not zombism, not poverty for 90% , it's not
so we're not there yet. where we have been before, so it seems
humaniterian cultures, true cultures, the Lotus of human civilization
have been... have been there before... what happened to them...
weren't they destroyed by the same system of ho'ly slavery...
yeap. that's what happened.
and this system is the continuation of the same cult,
the one that suppresses all humaniterian cultures
isn't it? wasn't it ? if so, it would explain the rotton fruits, the psudo culture, inforced top-down, by manipulation, brainwash, deceit, right? true cultures are not the result of brainwash, are they? were they? don't think so.
that's a huge problem, isn't it.
fruits of this civilization are crushed as soon as they start to flurish.
so it seems. and by whom other than the one percent? and why?
it's simple
in any system of slavery, poverty, slavery, zumbism, robotism...
will have to be enforced from top-down, so you keep bowing down to the top
if in fact this is the continuation of the same ho'ly slavery, which it is
then it's all self-explanatory...should be obvious to the masses by now
why even the lotus of American culture was crushed so harshly,
didn't the hippies have it right? weren't they more humaniterian?
weren't they for love, light, peace, and freedom of choice?
but it's easy for the system to divert each one of those virtues
and that's what happened. vices are continuously enforced on the masses.
so you go to the temples and the very same one percent can pretend to be the most virtuous,
almost god like, angelic, saints...unlike u poor slaves, robots, zumbies, who are rubbed of the chance to become "illuminated" like them, yes, you are rubbed of the chance, so only one percent can look good compare to masses of robots. so they can continue to manipulate you, in what seems like the same old sick game of ho'ly slavery. not the one prophets wanted, but the one they were also against.
isn't that so?
who knows.
